Skip to main content

Arias Defense Motion To Vacate Jury's Finding Of Aggravating Factor Denied

Jodi Arias’ defense attorneys motion to vacate the jury’s finding of an aggravating factor in her murder trial has been denied by Judge Sherry Stephens.  Kirk Nurmi’s motion challenged the landmark 2002 Ring v. Arizona Supreme Court ruling finding that allowing the sentencing judge, without a jury, to find aggravating circumstances necessary for the imposition of the death penalty violated the Federal Constitution’s Sixth Amendment right to trial by jury.

The motion was always a stretch, but the defense’s motion argued that the jury lacked the legal knowledge and expertise to recognize what made a particular murder more cruel and heinous than another.  With the motion denied, the trial jury’s finding of the aggravating factor stands – making Arias eligible for the death penalty when her sentencing retrial begins.  The next status hearing is scheduled for August 26, 2013.

As Arias sits in jail waiting to learn her fate, she continues to promote books and magazines she has received from her “supporters”.  Her latest tweet says she’s maxed out on the number of books she’s allowed to have, so if you were considering sending her one, don’t! Yeah, that was meant to be sarcastic.  The murderer turned humanitarian says “when Jodi finishes reading, at her request, every book, periodical and newspaper she receives are donated to less fortunate inmates”.  Potential jury pool, did you hear that?

It seems people are at odds at whether the State of Arizona should go through with the time and expense of choosing a new jury for sentencing.  I feel that since expense was not a consideration in Arias’ defense during the guilt phase, it’s only fair that Travis Alexander have the same consideration in sparing no expense to ensure a jury decides his killer’s fate.  It’s the law in Arizona, like it or not – a jury, not a judge decides.  Unless the second jury deadlocks, at which time the death penalty is taken off the table since a judge cannot impose it.  I suppose we should take some solace in knowing the most lenient sentence she could receive is life with the possibility for release after serving 25 years.  Having the possibility of release doesn’t mean she will be released, it just makes it a possibility. 

The decision will ultimately come down to the decision of County District Attorney Bill Montgomery’s office and the Alexander family’s input will be of great importance.  I think the defense is hoping these delays in sentencing will serve as a cooling off period in the court of public opinion, and they hope people will lose interest in this case and it’s outcome.  I don’t think that is going to happen.  While it appears Arias has people who support her while in jail, the public’s shock and sorrow over what happened to Travis Alexander is not going to fade until Arias has been sentenced and sent to prison.


What will happen at the next status hearing?  Will Judge Stephens set a firm date to begin jury selection?  Will the prosecution do anything differently during jury selection to ensure they have a death penalty qualified jury?  I’m not going to criticize the first jury on their decision, mostly because I wasn’t in the jury room and didn’t hear their arguments.  It can’t be easy to sentence somebody to death, but they clearly knew it would be a possibility in this trial.  I don’t know what prosecutor Juan Martinez could have done differently.  The State put on a great case, the defense offered no REAL mitigation – yet the jury deadlocked.  Sentencing can’t be put off forever.  There will be justice for Travis.

Comments

  1. Hi My Forte. Isn't this about the forth time Arias' defense has gone before Judge Sherry Stephens to vacate the jury’s finding of an aggravating factor? Or were they trying something else those other times to see what would stick? Anyway, I don't think it really takes that much legal knowledge and expertise to determine cruelty and how heinous one murder is over another. To say a jury basically cannot make that determination is pretty much a slap in the face, and also like saying determining guilt in the guilt/innocence phase of the trial was also a huge waste of time as well. Like what was the point in them even being there and even subjecting themselves to that in the first place! I would think a jury would know a murder such as a single gunshot to the chest or head is considerably less cruel and heinous than over 2 dozen stab wounds, slit from ear to ear...and a gunshot to the head wouldn't you say? But, none of my opinions matter a hill of beans...it's what passes legal muster, and has been brought into law for now, and Judge Stephens keeps denying these defense motions based on that.

    I hope, My Forte, that Judge Stephens will set a hard and fast date for jury selection, but I have ceased trying to predict anything where this trial is concerned. As anything that can go awry usually does! I wish I knew some magical difference that could be made in jury selection, but the truth is, it will be as it will be, and the chips will fall as they will this time too. You just never know with that many people...with that many personalities converging to decide upon another's fate. Suddenly, what seemingly may be quite simple for some becomes incredibly filled with complexities for others. We could see something similar as before. Or, this time, there could be 12 people who haven't 'fallen under the spell' and because of that haven't bought all those lies, (THE ACT) which is what I think is largely what happened before! Like I said, ya just never know. But the one thing Arias can't say of her last jury even though they did convict her....she sure got a temporary reprieve!

    Thanks for posting again My Forte. I always look forward to them. And it brings out others with good insights as well, with different things to bring to the table, that I enjoy very much. Just a most intelligent blog spot.

    Have a great weekend!

    ~M. Bethnae~

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thank you for commenting!

Most popular posts

Dr. Janeen DeMarte - A Look At The Prosecution's Expert Witness

Dr. Janeen DeMarte is expected to take the stand in the Jodi Arias murder trial as a key witness for the prosecution. Think of DeMarte as the State's response to Dr. Richard Samuels and potentially Alyce LaViolette. It's unclear when DeMarte will testify, but with Alyce LaViolette's testimony wrapping up, I thought it would be helpful to take a look at who the State's expert witness is.




Dr. Janeen DeMarte is a licensed clinical psychologist who has a private practice in the Phoenix area. She holds a master's degree and PhD in clinical psychology. with a concentration on forensics - and graduated from Michigan State University and fulfilled her doctoral residency at Arizona State Hospital.  Her clinical training was done at outpatient clinics, correctional facilities and inpatient unit settings. She has served as the Clinical Director of a large outpatient behavior health clinic in Phoenix and "oversaw the practice of numerous multidisciplinary treatment provide…

Is Alyce LaViolette Cashing In On Murder Trial?

As the defense finishes questioning their star witness, domestic abuse expert Alyce LaViolette, many are disillusioned by her choice to take the stand to portray murder defendant Jodi Arias as a battered and abused woman.  Maybe I'm the one who's crazy, but wasn't Travis Alexander the one who had the life stabbed, slashed and shot out of him at the hands of Jodi Arias? Who battered whom here?  Are Travis Alexander's not-so-kind text messages to Jodi Arias PROOF that he was a womanizing batterer and bully who held all the power in the relationship between Arias and Alexander?

Alyce LaViolette seems to think so. Does she have any idea the feelings of outrage she is bringing out in the hearts and minds of the real victims of domestic abuse all over the country? Before LaViolette began testifying, I kept asking myself "why would a woman who is so well respected in her field choose THIS case, defend THIS woman?"  Could it be the money? I suppose $250-$300 an hour c…

Was Trip to Cancun Catalyst to Murder? Jodi Arias Murder Trial

Marie "Mimi" Hall was the first prosecution witness to take the stand in the Jodi Arias Murder trial. She took the stand on January 3, 2013. Hall told jurors that she met Travis Alexander through the Mormon Church. Although they initially went on a date, it was quickly recognized that they were a great match as friends, and they remained such good friends that Alexander invited Hall to accompany him on a work retreat to Cancun, Mexico. The trip was to begin on June 10, 2008. Travis wouldn't live to see that day. Friends found him murdered in his home in Mesa, AZ on June 9, 2008. Coincidence, or catalyst? Travis's close friends have told investigators that Arias had been engaging in stalker-like behavior in the months preceding the murder. Twice, Alexander had his tires slashed after going out with other women. He told close friends his Facebook account had been hacked into. Arias even reportedly would use the doggie door to gain entry to Alexander's home. …

A Look At Alyce LaViolette And More Strange Video Footage of Arias Arrest

Yesterday, as Dr. Richard Samuels finished up his testimony the Jodi Arias defense team called their next expert witness to the stand, Alyce LaViolette. LaViolette is a very legitimate expert on the subject of domestic violence, having been one of the early leaders back in the 1970's when this was not a topic that was spoke of often. Jennifer Willmott had LaViolette introduce herself and her educational background, and list her many accomplishments helping battered women and even helping the men who battered them, hoping to return these women to a safer environment. She is likable, and she is a legitimate voice on this topic. The prosecution should not expect this witness to be as sloppy in the trial casework and reporting as Dr. Samuels was. 

While it's unknown exactly how far out on a limb LaViolette will go for Jodi Arias, she is expected to testify about some of the characteristics of battered women, why they return to their abusers - and what some of characteristics are of…

"Cold Justice" Heats Up Unsolved Murder Cases

This is my third blog post on TNT's new reality show, "Cold Justice".  Cold Justice pairs former Texas prosecutor Kelly Siegler with former Las Vegas CSI Yolanda McClary, who travel to small rural towns across America to look at unsolved murder cases.  Their first episode which aired Tuesday has already delivered results - the arrest of Ronnie Hendricks (see yesterdays post for details) for the murder of Pam Shelley. TNT lists an episode guide online, and 
I couldn't resist taking a peek and looking for details on those cases.  I was astonished at what they have accomplished in their first season.  This is more than just another crime drama, these ladies are committed and determined to bringing justice to those who may have escaped it previously in small towns that may lack the resources to bring a suspect to trial.

You can see the episode guide on their website. They give a brief description of the victims and circumstances of their deaths. Here is a list of this seas…