Episode 3 of TNT's Cold Justice uncovered a 31 year old blunder, or a mystery - depending on how you look at it. In last night's episode, former prosecutor Kelly Siegler returned to her home town in Matagorda County with Yolanda McCleary and Johnny Bonds to look into the 1982 homicide of 48 year old Charlene Corporon, who was shot in the head in the bedroom of her Palacio Texas home. Corporon ran a successful agricultural business in town with her son Gary, following the accidental death of her husband.
Police were called to the Corporon home after Charlene's boyfriend reportedly called her home and Gary told him "Charlene doesn't look too good". Her body was discovered on her bed, and although the bullets recovered from her head were fragmented they were later identified as .22 caliber. Back in 1982, there were two suspects in this case - Charlene's son Gary and her boyfriend. Family and friends told police that Gary was physically abusive towards his mother and he is believed to have injured her on more than one occasion. A former employee reportedly overheard Gary threaten to kill his mother. Her boyfriend was also a suspect early on because several of Charlene's friends reported that she planned to break off the relationship with him.
The investigation in 1982 led law enforcement to Gary Corporon, and the DA brought the case to a grand jury to seek a murder indictment against Corporon. This is where the mystery or blunder begins - law enforcement believed that the grand jury "passed" on this case, believing the police didn't have enough evidence at that point. Corporon had been arrested and later released on $100,000 bail. Several years, then decades went by and the case went cold. That is until a new sheriff decided to look into 5 unsolved homicides and Kelly Siegler and Cold Justice got involved. Their investigation uncovered something shocking - they discovered the grand jury had indicted Gary Corporon for murder on September 20, 1982! What happened here? Why were police under the impression the grand jury had not indicted Corporon, and who is responsible for ensuring the CORRECT information gets to those who need it?
It seems to me that this would be the responsibility of the District Attorney's office. After all, they would be prosecuting the case - did somebody drop the ball back in 1982? This seems shocking to me. Gary Corporon is now 58 years old and is believed to be working off-shore in Louisiana. Former sheriff's detective Nubbin Chamblee worked the case back in 1982, and he says he was surprised to find out that Corporon had been indicted by the original grand jury. Chamblee declined to discuss the potential miscommunication that led to the embarrassing 31 year delay in bringing this case to trial.
There is no record of the indictment, according to District Clerk Becky Denn. The former district attorney and former sheriff involved with the case in 1982 declined to comment. No surprise there, given the potential issues that have come to light. I believe the current District Attorney plans to re-indict Gary Corporon, using the information gathered from the original investigation back in 1982 and what Siegler and McClary were able to add based on their look at this case. Siegler found new witnesses who saw Gary Corporon with a .22 caliber gun just 2 weeks before his mother was killed. Corporon reportedly showed a .22 caliber rifle to friends during a fishing trip. This could be a crucial detail, given the chances of finding the murder weapon after 31 years is not likely.
Siegler interviewed her father, the town's barber who knew Charlene, Gary and Charlene's boyfriend. Siegler's father owns a barber shop/liquor store in this small town - Siegler's hand written signs still hang on her father's wall of the barber shop. That is definitely a small town where everybody seems to know each other, which makes this whole thing even more odd. You would think something as important as a murder indictment would be followed up on - I don't understand how Gary Corporon could be out on bail for 31 years. Doesn't the bail bond company follow up on people they bail out of jail? It seems there were so many missed opportunities and system failures with this murder case. Mistakes happen, but it's truly frightening to think that this may not have even been uncovered had it not been for a new sheriff and Cold Justice.
Amazon banner
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
My Apologies for Yesterday's Offensive Photo
I wanted to apologize for the photo posted with yesterday's story about a large mural that appeared suddenly on Christmas Eve in NYC. I...
Most popular posts
-
Dr. Janeen DeMarte is expected to take the stand in the Jodi Arias murder trial as a key witness for the prosecution. Think of DeMarte as th...
-
As the defense finishes questioning their star witness, domestic abuse expert Alyce LaViolette, many are disillusioned by her choice to take...
-
Marie "Mimi" Hall was the first prosecution witness to take the stand in the Jodi Arias Murder trial. She took the stand on Janua...
-
Yesterday, as Dr. Richard Samuels finished up his testimony the Jodi Arias defense team called their next expert witness to the stand, Alyce...
-
Episode 3 of TNT's Cold Justice uncovered a 31 year old blunder, or a mystery - depending on how you look at it. In last night's e...
Corruption? Did the bail get returned? Who signed off? Maybe more than one needs jail time.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous (10/1 @ 1:14AM),
DeleteThose are great questions. It doesn't seem likely any bail agent would have let a bond of that amount just skip. Not much information on those details have been released. Hmm, wonder why? Makes quite a few people look bad.
We (the audience) heard Gary's son say that he was in Africa working off-shore oil. That's surely a violation of the bond, if it still stands. I'd like to hear from whoever underwrote that bond. They only forfeit if he doesn't show for trial. Interesting mess, follow-up episode is definitely called for.
ReplyDeleteGreat Point. I always try to follow up and this one really peeked my interest.
DeleteAny update on this story?
ReplyDeleteI don't see any pictures of Gary Corporan on the internet. Why? How are people suppose to spot him?
ReplyDeleteDoris and Gary in Alaska 2011.
ReplyDeletehttps://scontent-b-ord.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/281479_2033168142071_5326654_n.jpg
I say start at the prior DA who is the only one that is privy to grand jury documents. Why was it sealed? This was a great episode and scary at the same time.
ReplyDeleteJacqueline,
DeleteThat IS a good place to start, with those who should have followed through or followed up. Did someone simply drop the ball or was it a cover up? I'm looking forward to the start of Season 2 next weekend. I love this show!
I grew up in this part of Texas, and what Kelly Siegler said is true, rumors and innuendo go 'round and 'round. But the other thing is that many things get swept under the proverbial rug. The "good ol' boy" network is still thriving in these small towns. Somebody always knows something on someone. Death, mischief, mayhem all run amok in these protected little enclaves. I know people from my hometown who systematically avoided prosecution because one of their family members taught them all how to beat an FBI polygraph test. Regardless that they'd all been involved in something that got the FBI interested in them in the first place - in tiny tiny small-town Texas. It's not hard to imagine how someone like Corporon got away with murder. And trust me he still works overseas, his wife is still as daffy and I assume the entire family that surrounds them knows the situation. Scary? Yep. Is he a danger? I don't know, but it makes me wonder how I'll respond to him the next time I'm invited to a family get together and he's there.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous (1/4 @ 12:17) ,
DeleteThank you for posting. Very interesting take from somebody local to the area. There are so many things that I just don't get with this story! How could something like this happen? Is he still out "on bail"? How can an entire murder indictment get pushed to the back burner? Smells like a cover up and there is no excuse for the way this case was handled. Thanks for sharing your insight.
How did he get the $100,000 insurance money while he was still under indictment?
ReplyDeleteAny further updates on this case? I've been searching and found nothing. Rumor has it now that the State Attorney's office is there this week investigating not only the DA's Office but the District Clerk's Office as well that should have had record of the indictment.
ReplyDeleteAny update? Anybody?
ReplyDeleteI'm from Palacios but live elsewhere now. Is there an update?
ReplyDeleteI've pretty much watched every episode of this show. Well at least I thought, bc I never seen this one. I was going thru netflix 2day and seen that cold justice was just added. So I watched. I never seen the 1st 3 eps of cj but I was completely astonished at this. And my 1st thought was cover up. Grand jury indictments don't just disappeare or are put on a shelf FOR ANYTHING LET ALONE MURDER. The bail part.. he absolutely isn't still out on bail. When the charges never went to trial. That was that. 10% is what he would have paid to the bondsman. And "even if he still out on bail" he's done nothing wrong. Bailbonds only have a problem when you miss your court date. Which, never happend. And what about the 23 grand jurors? They have 2 live in that county.. they know if they true billed it or not. And if they did true bill than why after all these years hasn't anyone of them said something? At least asked the court... makes no sense. And as for him getting the life insurance $ as far as the life ins co thought he wasn't a suspect anymore. The entire thing is messed up. I just started looking in to updates and came across this page. Haven't found 1 yet but that's what I'm going to do right now. Hopfully I'll find one!
ReplyDeleteI just watched this episode too and have been totally left with questions and concerns since! Did you find anything? Any justice for her? Why is this man not in prison!
DeleteThis just gets weirder and weirder!!
ReplyDeleteWhy with all the publicity is there no more information on this case? Was there ever a look into where the life insurance money was dispersed, maybe a payoff? I find it hard to believe that even with the years from the so called indictment that there is talk on the internet that he may not go to trial because he wasn't given a speedy trial. Since when does murder have a statue of limitations. Not going to trial because of not having a speedy trial is just bull. It looks like people can get away with murder, even if the power that be know your guilty. How on earth do people even stomach that man in that small town? Ugh.
ReplyDeleteI just watched this episode. I couldn't believe the blurp at the end about the Grand jury not responding? So I googled, and it brought me here? Are you kidding me? What is wrong with this picture? Why is this not on the NBC nightly news! CNN! Something must be done!
ReplyDeletewhoah this weblog is magnificent i like reading your articles. Keep up the good work! You already know, lots of individuals are searching round for this information, you could aid them greatly.
ReplyDelete