Who Killed Detective Sean Suiter and Why?

Detective Sean Suiter - Courtesy of BPD

There are still many unanswered questions around the bizarre execution style shooting of a 18 year veteran of the Baltimore Police Department, Sean Suiter.  Suiter was with his partner at the time of the shooting - they were canvassing at the scene of a triple homicide that happened nearly a year ago when they observed "a suspicious man" in a vacant lot.  They didn't initially approach him, but when they saw him a second time they did.  There aren't many details being shared except for what was described as a brief but violent struggle between Suiter and the killer where the killer was able to disarm Suiter and kill him with his own weapon.  I want to know how he was able to do this with Suiter's partner there?  How is this even possible?

Baltimore PD Commissioner Davis wants us all to believe the shooting was "random" and had nothing to do with Suiter's expected testimony against 8 of his fellow officers in front of a federal grand jury the following day.  How can this be a coincidence or a random act of violence?  And where and what was Suiter's partner doing during this struggle? Suiter's partner's identity is being withheld or "protected" by the police brass.  What are they hiding?  Sure seems like something is off here.  It sounds to me like he was lured to that vacant lot for the purpose of making sure he wasn't available to give his testimony the next day.  That makes more sense than some random man shooting a detective right in front of the detectives partner.  What's even stranger is how the partner could not give a description of the shooter other than a very generic one.  You'd think you would remember the face of the man who killed your partner.  

The indicted officers are accused of stealing from residents/citizens, racketeering, collaborating with drug dealers and tipping them off to police activities in order to help them avoid apprehension, and there are accusations this "elite" task force was dealing drugs themselves.  That sounds like a whole lot of motive to want someone dead - depending on what Suiter knew and was going to testify to.  Suiter was not subject of the investigation, only a witness.  

According to Afro.com, Commissioner Davis has stated "it appears to be nothing more than a spontaneous observation of a man acting suspiciously and a spontaneous decision to investigate his conduct".  Davis has repeatedly stated that he does not believe the federal grand jury testimony and the murder are connected.  How can he reach that conclusion so quickly?  These officers have a lot to lose if they go down on the pending charges.  Their jobs, their pensions, their reputations.  They call that MOTIVE.  A lot more motive than the random suspicious man in the vacant lot theory.  

It appears not everyone in the Baltimore PD is buying this is NOT related.  One former homicide detective has a hard time imagining how this suspicious man could disarm the 18 year veteran with his partner nearby - the same question I have.  Partners are notorious for covering each other's back.  Further, law enforcement wears holsters, making it even more difficult to get Suiter's weapon from him.  It would have been very difficult had the partner really actually been "nearby".  I'd like to see a full videotaped re enactment of this whole bull crap story.  I'm not holding my breath.

We have not heard the last of this murder - let's pray this doesn't get swept under the rug for the sake of Detective Suiter and his family.  If it was random, that's unfortunate.  It just doesn't seem possible it's unrelated to the federal grand jury testimony given the circumstances with Suiter's partner and Suiter being disarmed by a random suspicious man with no real description.  There are no real leads in this case as of yet.  I could offer a few.........

Jodi Arias In The News Again - Appellate Problems, Suing Former Attorney Over "Tell All" Book

Here we go again people.  We couldn't have possibly thought we'd heard the last of convicted murderer Jodi Arias.  I don't think there has ever been a murder defendant...I mean convicted murderer who garners more attention than she does.  She basks in the limelight of finally being someone people see.  Does she realize there's a difference between famous and infamy?  Probably, she's not an unintelligent woman - I've written to her and have received responses.  She's very well spoken and surprisingly pleasant for a woman who stabbed her ex boyfriend 31 times, slashed his throat and shot him in the face.  It's sometimes hard to imagine the soft spoken Arias actually had that rage inside of her, but CLEARLY she did.

She loved the attention she got from this crime from the day of her first mug shot.  Remember, she asked to put on makeup prior to the photo being taken? Her escapades during her interrogations were epic, who stands on their head in an interrogation room where you have to know you are being filmed?  Who sings a song to pass the time and goes through the trash while the detectives are out of the room?  Jodi did.

Now that her case is up for appeal a whole litany of issues have come up.  The sheer volume of the case file for this trial makes it a real headache for the appellate attorney.  Naturally Arias' attorney will allege as many trial errors as they can - as well as prosecutorial misconduct, an overzealous media who "tainted" the public against her and caused her character witnesses to back out and naturally she is suing her attorney Kirk Nurmi for his tell all book "Trapped With Ms. Arias". What a telling title. It's no secret he tried and tried and tried again to be removed as her attorney.  He even quit the public defender's office and went into private practice but was forced by the court to continue on as her attorney.  I really got the sense he didn't care much for her.  But that doesn't mean he didn't do his best to defend her.  He and Jennifer Willmott had the impossible task of explaining why Jodi butchered Travis and then tried to cover the whole thing up with a bogus trip to Utah to see Ryan Burns.

Arias may have been an epic liar, but she was definitely a rookie murderer who left behind a virtual road map pointing right to the killer - her.  Leaving that camera behind was the biggest blunder.  It proved she WAS in Mesa when she said she hadn't been there.  it proved she had been intimate with Travis just hours before his death.  It proved a lot of things that she otherwise may have been able to explain away (i.e. her hair being there, fingerprints etc.).

There was never any doubt in my mind this was premeditated.  I don't know what she gains if she were to win an appeal - another trial would be another complete circus - more than likely more than the first one was if that's even possible.  Arias still is out there asking people to fund her appeal and her appellate fund allegedly has approximately $115,000 of her ultimate goal of $250,000.  

Arias continues to go after Kirk Nurmi and his book, claiming he disclosed information that was privileged and she also alleges he was "obsessed" with the sexual aspects of the case. Jodi is the one who centered her defense around sex.  Nurmi on the other hand has claimed Arias was completely inappropriate with him, telling him how she shaves certain areas and other things he didn't want or need to know.  She was unable to wrap Nurmi around her finger as she did with Dr. Samuel's and Alyce La Violette.

Nurmi ultimately surrendered his law license - I think being forced to defend someone like Jodi Arias made him wonder if he was in the right profession.  I hope his book does well.  I didn't like the guy during the trial, but he was just doing his job.  I wonder what Jennifer Willmott is up to these days?  And what ever happened to Maria De La Rosa?

Jodi Arias and Maria De la Rosa in court

She was the death penalty "mitigation specialist" who didn't seem to do a lot and was caught smuggling Arias' artwork out of the Estrella jail after a visit with Arias.  She was banned from the jail for some period of time for that escapade.  People also believe she was in cahoots with Arias and her "followers" to hide the money Arias was collecting from sales of "artwork" and other Arias artifacts - she needed to hide the money from Travis Alexander's family.  She shouldn't have been allowed to sell anything from jail especially after being convicted.  I'd still love to see the IRS and Arizona tax authority audit her as I'm 110% sure it's all unreported income.  And all the while the citizens of AZ are paying for her multi million dollar defense.

It's unclear if Arias' lawsuit versus Nurmi will go anywhere. This already came up and Nurmi surrendered his law license and I'm not sure what stipulations that came with or if that absolved him of any financial liability.  Everybody has written a book about the Jodi Arias trial - freedom of speech.  I'm sure it's different with attorneys however, and Arias does still have appeals.  We will have to see how this pans out.

The difference in appearance in Kirk Nurmi from the beginning of the trial to the end is unreal.  I found a few pics I just had to post - here's a comparison.  The "before" pic may be a little childish but I couldn't help myself - until next time!

Kirk Nurmi before

Kirk Nurmi after