Skip to main content

Time For Jodi Arias To Answer Jury Questions

Defense attorney Kirk Nurmi finished up his redirect of murder defendant Jodi Arias on Tuesday, her 15th consecutive day on the witness stand. More than 50% of court time has featured Jodi Arias, something relatively shocking in a day where most defendants never take the stand in their own defense. Arias had no choice but to take the stand due to the overwhelming physical evidence gathered from the Mesa crime scene, and the vicious nature of the murder of 30 year old Travis Alexander.

Arizona courts allow the jurors to ask questions of the witnesses in a case, and yesterday it was revealed that the Arias jury has submitted more than 100 questions throughout her 15 days on the witness stand. When cross examined by prosecutor Juan Martinez, Arias was often times combative, dismissive and otherwise uncooperative - answering "sure", "OK", "I don't recall", "I don't remember", and "I don't understand what you are asking me". She will not be able to take this tactic with the jury who holds her fate in their hands. The jury will want answers.

I find it unfortunate that while the jury has heard and seen Jodi Arias on the stand for the last 15 days, they have had little exposure to the murder victim Travis Alexander - and what they have heard of him hasn't been good. They were subjected to a graphic XXX rated audio recording made by Arias, in which the pair talk in graphic detail about things they would like to do to each other. The defense has painted Travis Alexander as a sexual deviant, a man who secretly had an attraction to young boys, who used Arias for kinky and degrading sex acts and brutalized her on several occasions. There is no proof that any of the alleged incidents of violence ever occurred, other than Jodi Arias's word that they did. There is no proof that Alexander had inappropriate feelings for young boys. The defense took a sentence that he uttered on the now infamous sex tape and built the lies around what little "proof" they had to work with. Arias contends she taped the May 2008 call at the request of Travis, but after hearing the tape it seems clear to me that he had no idea it was being recorded.

If only the jury could ask Travis Alexander how he felt when he was first stabbed, and realized it was the woman he had just been intimate with. If only Travis could testify about how scared he was when he had a gun pointed at his face and was shot.  If only he could tell the jury how having his throat cut by Jodi Arias felt.  If only.....

The defense still has more witnesses to call in their case in chief. Expect to hear expert witnesses in the area of battered woman's syndrome, PTSD and maybe even domestic violence testify. Since they have all formed opinions based on what Arias has told them and considering they are witnesses for the defense, I'd expect they will testify that Arias shows signs of being a battered woman - this will be hard to sit through. Expect Juan Martinez to cross examine them, and ask them if their opinions would be invalid if Arias was found to be lying to them.  Expect Juan Martinez to call experts for the State during his rebuttal case.  Then closing arguments will begin - followed by the jury instructions and deliberations.  When will this all end? The judge appears to be erring on the side of caution in giving the defense a great deal of latitude in their testimony and lines of questioning, as is such with a death penalty case.

There were a few comments about the gun evidence in this case. If this gun could possibly help Jodi Arias, I believe the defense would have found it. They've had years and years to have Jodi Arias guide them to an approximate area where she tossed the gun in the desert. I believe that IF the gun was in fact not her grandfather's stolen .25 caliber gun, she would've had no reason to take it and dispose of it. She took the gun because it could be linked back to her grandfather and to her.  If the gun wasn't Arias's grandfathers, that would go a long way to showing Arias did not have premeditation in bringing that gun with her.  Yesterday, she added a detail to her gun story. She claims that when she went into that closet on 6/4/08, she didn't go in with the intent of getting the gun (her use of words, "intent" is obvious), rather she thought of it after she was already in the closet. She added a detail we hadn't heard before, saying the gun used to be kept in a holster on the top shelf.  She believes that adding such a detail gives her story more credibility, it does just the opposite, it makes her look even more deceptive to me.

Jodi Arias is trying to escape punishment for brutally and viciously killing this man she claimed to be in love with. When it helps her to say she loved him she does, yet when it makes her look bad (obsession) she claims she only loved him as a friend. They have put their own spin on the little they have to work with in defending this woman, but did they go overboard in their attempts to paint him in such an unflattering light? It angers me when the murder victims seem to be forgotten in these trials where it becomes all about the defendant and all the people who have wronged them, and all the abuse they suffered as a child and adult. What about Travis Alexander? I hope the jury remembers who the true victim is, I hope they look carefully at the crime scene photos and the vicious nature of this attack, and I hope they apply their own common sense to reach the appropriate conclusion. This just doesn't look like self defense, regardless of how they are trying to make Travis Alexander look like a deviant. That is not even relevant, if you do believe Arias.

The jury questions are supposed to begin today. It's being reported that the judge and attorneys are meeting early this morning to begin reading though them - the judge must decide which questions can be asked, and then Arias will have to answer to the jury!  Can't wait.


The attorneys, prosecutor and judge are reviewing the jury questions now. It looks like many of these questions won't be asked. They have already thrown out several questions that cannot be asked for legal reasons.  They are now going through each question that the defense doesn't want to be asked, defense gives their reason for objecting to the question and the judge asks for the State's stance, and then she decides if the question is in or out.

So far, I've heard the defense try to get 9 questions tossed, and the judge has overruled their objection on about 50% of them so far. We aren't hearing the questions, only the objections from either side and the basis of the objection (such as relevance, and I Nurmi argued a question went into attorney-client privilege on one question).

I'll bet the "attorney client privilege" question was a good one! Will be interesting to hear these questions, that's for sure. Jodi Arias is staring off into space with a blank look on her face as this process is unfolding. It's unclear whether Arias will have access to the questions before they are asked. Will she be caught off guard, like she was when Juan Martinez asked her something she wasn't expecting? She tried to buy some time to formulate her answer by stating "you haven't asked me about that before".  Aha.

Well, it's now 10:57AM PST and the judge just took the attorneys to her chambers. Not sure what's happening now.


  1. I believe that 80% of the questions will not be heard or
    answered. JMO. I think her attorneys will be viewing the
    questions and not liking them. Well we will see how many
    actually make it.

    1. Anonymous, you are probably right. I disagree with the theory of allowing jury questions but vetting them so carefully that the tough questions go unanswered. These are the people deciding her fate! Some of the earlier jury questions had me worried, as if they questioned the crime scene processing and investigation. Could be a mixed bag today! Thanks for writing....

  2. Arias’ emotions are completely absent. When people experience trauma, their memory and emotions become deeply intertwined, and when they recount their story, their emotions always come flooding back. Yet Arias is an exception here. She recounts the so called attack that really was her attack and vicious murder of Travis. ZERO emotion.

    1. NancyB, I agree completely! I believe there can be cases where traumatic events are too painful to recount - but this isn't that! Even people who come back from war have horrible flashbacks. The fact that she remembers what happened immediately before, and after the killing speaks volumes. The jury doesn't seem to be buying her convenient blackout. Did you notice she got tripped up during jury questioning when she said she only experienced blackouts at the age of 19, and those were alcohol related? She contradicts herself constantly because earlier she said this began when she was 14! Can't keep her story straight. She remembers, every detail. And yes, she seems to have no remorse or true emotion as she smiles as she recounts some of the times she shared with Travis. How could you smile or be remotely upbeat knowing you stabbed somebody, slit a persons throat and shot somebody in the head? I would be a wreck, as most people would! I get the feeling she is enjoying this trial and all of the media attention she is getting!


    I wish I could tell the prosecutor to review this pic carefully- its one of the ones she “deleted” and they found the camera in the washer- in the very bottom right corner, a .25 caliber gun barrel is visable-JA may have had Travis at gunpoint- she snapped this photo and cropped out his facial expression- I think this is when he lunged and tried to disarm her and she stabbed him in the chest while doing so- which would explain the neatness of the closet- i think he got up and was at the sink spitting out blood cause she had nicked the lung with the stab to the heart and she began her brutal stabbing assault to his head and back. That’s a gun, isn’t it?

    1. NancyB, I saw that too!! I didn't know what it was, I actually sent a Facebook message to Jean Casarez (HLN In Session) last week! It's in the right lower corner of the pic, right?


Post a Comment

Thank you for commenting!

Most popular posts

Dr. Janeen DeMarte - A Look At The Prosecution's Expert Witness

Dr. Janeen DeMarte is expected to take the stand in the Jodi Arias murder trial as a key witness for the prosecution. Think of DeMarte as the State's response to Dr. Richard Samuels and potentially Alyce LaViolette. It's unclear when DeMarte will testify, but with Alyce LaViolette's testimony wrapping up, I thought it would be helpful to take a look at who the State's expert witness is.

Dr. Janeen DeMarte is a licensed clinical psychologist who has a private practice in the Phoenix area. She holds a master's degree and PhD in clinical psychology. with a concentration on forensics - and graduated from Michigan State University and fulfilled her doctoral residency at Arizona State Hospital.  Her clinical training was done at outpatient clinics, correctional facilities and inpatient unit settings. She has served as the Clinical Director of a large outpatient behavior health clinic in Phoenix and "oversaw the practice of numerous multidisciplinary treatment provide…

Is Alyce LaViolette Cashing In On Murder Trial?

As the defense finishes questioning their star witness, domestic abuse expert Alyce LaViolette, many are disillusioned by her choice to take the stand to portray murder defendant Jodi Arias as a battered and abused woman.  Maybe I'm the one who's crazy, but wasn't Travis Alexander the one who had the life stabbed, slashed and shot out of him at the hands of Jodi Arias? Who battered whom here?  Are Travis Alexander's not-so-kind text messages to Jodi Arias PROOF that he was a womanizing batterer and bully who held all the power in the relationship between Arias and Alexander?

Alyce LaViolette seems to think so. Does she have any idea the feelings of outrage she is bringing out in the hearts and minds of the real victims of domestic abuse all over the country? Before LaViolette began testifying, I kept asking myself "why would a woman who is so well respected in her field choose THIS case, defend THIS woman?"  Could it be the money? I suppose $250-$300 an hour c…

Was Trip to Cancun Catalyst to Murder? Jodi Arias Murder Trial

Marie "Mimi" Hall was the first prosecution witness to take the stand in the Jodi Arias Murder trial. She took the stand on January 3, 2013. Hall told jurors that she met Travis Alexander through the Mormon Church. Although they initially went on a date, it was quickly recognized that they were a great match as friends, and they remained such good friends that Alexander invited Hall to accompany him on a work retreat to Cancun, Mexico. The trip was to begin on June 10, 2008. Travis wouldn't live to see that day. Friends found him murdered in his home in Mesa, AZ on June 9, 2008. Coincidence, or catalyst? Travis's close friends have told investigators that Arias had been engaging in stalker-like behavior in the months preceding the murder. Twice, Alexander had his tires slashed after going out with other women. He told close friends his Facebook account had been hacked into. Arias even reportedly would use the doggie door to gain entry to Alexander's home. …

A Look At Alyce LaViolette And More Strange Video Footage of Arias Arrest

Yesterday, as Dr. Richard Samuels finished up his testimony the Jodi Arias defense team called their next expert witness to the stand, Alyce LaViolette. LaViolette is a very legitimate expert on the subject of domestic violence, having been one of the early leaders back in the 1970's when this was not a topic that was spoke of often. Jennifer Willmott had LaViolette introduce herself and her educational background, and list her many accomplishments helping battered women and even helping the men who battered them, hoping to return these women to a safer environment. She is likable, and she is a legitimate voice on this topic. The prosecution should not expect this witness to be as sloppy in the trial casework and reporting as Dr. Samuels was. 

While it's unknown exactly how far out on a limb LaViolette will go for Jodi Arias, she is expected to testify about some of the characteristics of battered women, why they return to their abusers - and what some of characteristics are of…

"Cold Justice" Heats Up Unsolved Murder Cases

This is my third blog post on TNT's new reality show, "Cold Justice".  Cold Justice pairs former Texas prosecutor Kelly Siegler with former Las Vegas CSI Yolanda McClary, who travel to small rural towns across America to look at unsolved murder cases.  Their first episode which aired Tuesday has already delivered results - the arrest of Ronnie Hendricks (see yesterdays post for details) for the murder of Pam Shelley. TNT lists an episode guide online, and 
I couldn't resist taking a peek and looking for details on those cases.  I was astonished at what they have accomplished in their first season.  This is more than just another crime drama, these ladies are committed and determined to bringing justice to those who may have escaped it previously in small towns that may lack the resources to bring a suspect to trial.

You can see the episode guide on their website. They give a brief description of the victims and circumstances of their deaths. Here is a list of this seas…